NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 771 MHz
- 387.7x more texture fill rate: 38.26 GTexel/s vs 98.69 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 100 Watt
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 771 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s vs 98.69 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- 4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 384
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11544 vs 10876
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 366 vs 230
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3072 vs 2454
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2784
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2784
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6747 vs 3808
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6747 vs 3808
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 384 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11544 vs 10876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 vs 230 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 vs 2454 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 vs 3808 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 vs 3808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10876 | 11544 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 230 | 366 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2454 | 3072 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2784 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2784 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3808 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3808 | 6747 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK104 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 761 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $309.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1594 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1531 MHz | 771 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 25.50 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 38.26 GTexel/s | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1800 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |