NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1468 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• 1082.5x more texture fill rate: 46.98 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 350.4x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12508 vs 11310
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3329
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3683
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3904 vs 2807
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 512 vs 241
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 4655
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 4655
• Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1265 vs 1247

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2807 3904
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 512
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12508 11310
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4655 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4655 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1247 1265

Compare specifications (specs)