NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and AMD Radeon R9 M290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1400x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 8.3x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3733 vs 3226
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29152 vs 22299
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 2581
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2526
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 2581
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2526
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 9 January 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3733 vs 3226 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29152 vs 22299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2526 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 896
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 420 vs 304
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6666 vs 6326
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6666 vs 6326
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 896 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 420 vs 304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 vs 6326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 vs 6326 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3733 | 3226 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 420 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29152 | 22299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 6666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 2526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 6666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 2526 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2037 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Neptune |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 518 | 584 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,800 million |
Compute units | 20 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |