NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 45818.2x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- 112x more pipelines: 896 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 8.3x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 40.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3733 vs 93
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 15 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3733 vs 93 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 334 vs 304
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 334 vs 304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3733 | 93 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 334 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2029 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | G98 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 515 | 484 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 550 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 22.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | MXM-II |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |