NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3130.4x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 896 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3734 vs 2840
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29141 vs 9716
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 3245
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 3245
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3734 vs 2840 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29141 vs 9716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 304
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3734 | 2840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 471 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29141 | 9716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 3245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2031 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 518 | 754 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |