NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3130.4x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 896 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 238 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3734 vs 2840
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29141 vs 9716
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6326 vs 3245
- Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6326 vs 3245
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 448 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3734 vs 2840 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29141 vs 9716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 vs 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 471 vs 304
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 471 vs 304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3734 | 2840 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 | 471 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29141 | 9716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6326 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6326 | 3245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2031 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 908.754 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.015 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.519 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | NVIDIA Tesla C2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
| Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 1 Aug 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 518 | 754 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 248 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.03 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10002 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560
NVIDIAGeForce MX450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
