NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11355 vs 10972
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 11029
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 11029
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 vs 10972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1920
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 588 vs 540
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3720
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3720
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1920 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 3720 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5904 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 588 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 | 10972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | 11029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7766 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106B | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 158 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 960 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s |