NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
  • Around 21% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5906 vs 4887
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 540 vs 437
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11355 vs 9982
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 14915
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 14915
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 27 June 2017
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5906 vs 4887
PassMark - G2D Mark 540 vs 437
PassMark - G3D Mark 11355 vs 9982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17150 vs 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17150 vs 14915

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 960 MHz
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1379 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 7% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1920
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8902 vs 3720
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8902 vs 3720
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8048 vs 3358
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8048 vs 3358
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1215 MHz vs 960 MHz
Boost clock speed 1379 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Pipelines 2048 vs 1920
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8902 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8902 vs 3720
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8048 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8048 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
5906
4887
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
540
437
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11355
9982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17150
14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17150
14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
8902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3720
8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
8048
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
8048
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5906 4887
PassMark - G2D Mark 540 437
PassMark - G3D Mark 11355 9982
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17150 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17150 14915
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3720 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3720 8902
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 8048
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 8048
Geekbench - OpenCL 37928
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 214.123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2293.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.704
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 139.717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 692.9

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU106B GP104
Launch date 29 January 2019 27 June 2017
Place in performance rating 204 223
Price now $349.99
Type Laptop Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 62.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1379 MHz
Core clock speed 960 MHz 1215 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 1920 2048
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 5,648 gflops
Texture fill rate 176.5 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 192 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 256.3 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready