NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3290
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 540
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19286 vs 11355
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 17150
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 17150
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 868 vs 540 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19286 vs 11355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 17150 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5908 | 0 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | 868 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11355 | 19286 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106B | TU102 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 205 | 103 |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 960 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |