NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 71.4x lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 12500 million
- 17.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16573 vs 11300
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 859 vs 784
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 87035 vs 53445
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 246.191 vs 135.416
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3885.018 vs 3063.269
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.053 vs 12.678
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1271.757 vs 883.876
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 vs 11925
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 vs 3947
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 vs 11925
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 vs 3947
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 19 March 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 12500 million |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16573 vs 11300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 vs 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87035 vs 53445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 vs 135.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 vs 3063.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 vs 12.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 vs 883.876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 vs 3947 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2176
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 5026
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 5026
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2176 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 5026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 5026 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16573 | 11300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 859 | 784 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87035 | 53445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 246.191 | 135.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3885.018 | 3063.269 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.053 | 12.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 165.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1271.757 | 883.876 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 10411 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | TU106 | Greenland |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 19 March 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 145 | 228 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1200 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2176 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 3072 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 10.8 B | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |