NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 10x more pipelines: 1920 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 22.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14151 vs 641
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 441
- 18.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 1087
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 2012
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3071
- 18.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 1087
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 2012
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 January 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 846 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1920 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14151 vs 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 5.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 160 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14151 | 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70668 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3071 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 7 January 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Place in performance rating | 150 | 830 |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 846 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 1270 Million |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIATITAN V
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
