NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3652
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3290
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3652
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 14151
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 750
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 70668
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 220.337
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3131.344
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 21.852
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 135.923
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1141.283
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 20094
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 20094

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14151 19370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	750 869
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	70668 136722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	220.337 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3131.344 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.852 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.923 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1141.283 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6714 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20094 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7442 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6714 3290

Compare specifications (specs)