NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD FirePro S9300 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 885 MHz vs 850 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78907 vs 27971
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 31 March 2016 |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78907 vs 27971 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9300 X2
- 3.6x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2304
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2304 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9300 X2
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD FirePro S9300 X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11774 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78907 | 27971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD FirePro S9300 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 31 March 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 179 | 841 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 8,900 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 6,963 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 217.6 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 512.0 GB / s |