NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 750 Watt
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11756 vs 7987
• Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 43046
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 168.08 vs 106.585
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1935.102 vs 1878.403
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 9.751
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.023 vs 82.208
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1001.496 vs 511.115
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 9143
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 8219
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 9143
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 8219

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 885 MHz
• Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 484
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 8055
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 8055

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11756 7987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	484 752
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	78123 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.08 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1935.102 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.794 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.023 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1001.496 511.115
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 32085

Compare specifications (specs)