NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD FireStream 9370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD FireStream 9370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 885 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 44% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- 4.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11774 vs 2528
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 23 June 2010 |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1600 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11774 vs 2528 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9370
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 763 vs 485
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 vs 485 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9370
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD FireStream 9370 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11774 | 2528 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 485 | 763 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78907 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD FireStream 9370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | TU106 | Cypress |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 23 June 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 179 | 131 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1600 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 2,154 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 66.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB / s |