NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
  • Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78907 vs 64683
  • Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 17.305
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 13848
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3680
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3336
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 13848
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3680
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3336
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 10 July 2017
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 78907 vs 64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 22.794 vs 17.305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17328 vs 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8055 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17328 vs 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8055 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
  • Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1185 MHz
  • Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12960 vs 11774
  • Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 485
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 174.714 vs 168.08
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 vs 1935.102
  • Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 111.023
  • Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 vs 1001.496
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed 1500 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Pipelines 4096 vs 2304
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 12960 vs 11774
PassMark - G2D Mark 746 vs 485
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 174.714 vs 168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3924.968 vs 1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 175.219 vs 111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1226.861 vs 1001.496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11774
12960
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
485
746
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
78907
64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
168.08
174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1935.102
3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.794
17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
111.023
175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1001.496
1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17328
13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8912
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8055
3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17328
13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8912
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8055
3336
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark 11774 12960
PassMark - G2D Mark 485 746
Geekbench - OpenCL 78907 64683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 168.08 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1935.102 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 22.794 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 111.023 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1001.496 1226.861
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 17328 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8055 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 17328 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8055 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6838

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU106 Vega 10
Launch date 29 January 2019 10 July 2017
Place in performance rating 179 197
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,599

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1185 MHz 1500 MHz
Core clock speed 885 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 2304 4096
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million 12,500 million
Floating-point performance 12,288 gflops
Texture fill rate 384.0 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 256 Bit 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 1890 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB / s