NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 295 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 14.889
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 14744
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3358
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 14744
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3358
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 7 August 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 295 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 vs 14.889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1247 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1546 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- 3.6x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2304
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14393 vs 11745
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 483
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 vs 78123
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 vs 168.08
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2129.009 vs 1935.102
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 vs 111.023
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 vs 1001.496
- Around 10% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7522 vs 6841
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1247 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14393 vs 11745 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 vs 78123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 vs 1001.496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7522 vs 6841 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11745 | 14393 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 | 7522 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 178 | 170 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $449.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 8192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 295 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Texture fill rate | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 279 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |