NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 75593
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 17.789
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 12980
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3356
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 12980
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3718
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 vs 75593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 vs 17.789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1382 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 vs 11758
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 484
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 vs 168.08
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 vs 1935.102
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 vs 111.023
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 vs 1001.496
- Around 3% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7074 vs 6838
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1382 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 vs 11758 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 484 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 vs 1001.496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 vs 6838 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11758 | 13327 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | 75593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 190.25 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 3611.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 17.789 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 181.113 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1373.944 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 12980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6838 | 7074 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 178 | 199 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 1382 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 13,107 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 409.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s |