NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 6319
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 5714
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 6319
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 5714
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 5714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 5714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2304
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 11748
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 483
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 17328
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 17328
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10098 vs 6841
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 vs 11748 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 17328 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10098 vs 6841 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11748 | 15107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 812 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 22622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 5714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 22622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 6319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 5714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 | 10098 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 178 | 106 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Price now | $699.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2944 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
