NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3713
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3713
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 11761
- Around 83% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 484
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 vs 78123
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 vs 168.08
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 141.066 vs 111.023
- Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 vs 1001.496
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 17328
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 17328
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 vs 11761 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 484 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 vs 78123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 vs 1001.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 17328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11761 | 20021 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | 888 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | 160720 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 562.775 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 141.066 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1964.377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU106 | GV100 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 178 | 94 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1628 MHz |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 1132 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s |