NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 885 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 2304 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 18.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11756 vs 641
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 vs 441
- 15.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 1087
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 2012
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3071
- 15.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 1087
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 2012
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 885 MHz vs 846 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11756 vs 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 vs 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 115 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11756 | 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3071 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6838 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 178 | 830 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 846 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 1270 Million |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
