NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 vs 74179
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3357
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3717
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 885 MHz
• Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1185 MHz
• Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 11758
• Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 484
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 168.08
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 1935.102
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 22.794
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.677 vs 111.023
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1001.496
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 17328
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 17328
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 6838

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11758 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	484 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	78123 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.08 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1935.102 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.794 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.023 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1001.496 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6838 13943

Compare specifications (specs)