NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN V

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN V videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 8.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1700 MHz
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 111.023 vs 20.669
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 15401
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3716
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 4193
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 15401
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3716
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 4193

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN V

• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 885 MHz
• Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1185 MHz
• 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19884 vs 11746
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 868 vs 483
• Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 150662 vs 78123
• Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 vs 168.08
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3583.136 vs 1935.102
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 vs 22.794
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 vs 1001.496
• Around 92% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13111 vs 6841

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11746 19884
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 868
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	78123 150662
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	168.08 270.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1935.102 3583.136
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.794 30.857
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.023 20.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1001.496 1504.373
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 4193
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	17328 15401
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8912 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8055 4193
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	6841 13111

Compare specifications (specs)