NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11745 vs 6284
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 483 vs 371
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 9390
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3683
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3260
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 9390
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3683
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11745 vs 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11745 | 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 178 | 356 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1185 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 885 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
