NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 536
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 536 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Around 28% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2304
- Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7988 vs 7449
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13147 vs 12354
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 18604
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 18604
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 2304 |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7988 vs 7449 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 vs 12354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 8029 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7449 | 7988 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 536 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 13147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 8905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 8060 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 8060 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU106 | TU104B |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 128 | 142 |
| Price now | $489.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2944 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
