NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3652
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3290
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3290
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 601
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12354
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 18604
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 18604
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 601 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 18604 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 | 0 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 869 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 19370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 3290 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 136722 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU102 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 128 | 103 |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |