NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- 1607x more texture fill rate: 220.8 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8340 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9083 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 700 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102892 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 236 | 107 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 220.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.13 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.066 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 220.8 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |