NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18253 vs 7987
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 752
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99847 vs 43046
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 106.585
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 1878.403
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 9.751
- Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 82.208
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 511.115
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 9143
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 9143
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 26 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 750 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 vs 7987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 752 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 vs 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3718
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3359
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3718
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 7987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 752 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Hawaii |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 133 | 190 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 930 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13.6 B | 6,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 275 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
