NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 77% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 28x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18253 vs 8137
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 745
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99809 vs 53806
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 141.474
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3621.344
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 13.132
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 112.973
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 799.933
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 10141
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 10141
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 vs 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 vs 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2560
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3359
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2560 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 8137 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 745 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Capsaicin |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $1,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 133 | 188 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Design | reference | |
| Price now | $849 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2x 4096 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13.6 B | 8,900 million |
| Compute units | 128 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
| Eyefinity | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 277 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
