NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 900 MHz
Around 91% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 925 MHz
2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
2.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Around 42% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99809 vs 70535
4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 6316
4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 6316

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 July 2019 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed	1605 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz vs 925 MHz
Pipelines	2560 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	99809 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25232 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25232 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 215 Watt
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3718
8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3359
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3718
8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3359

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt vs 215 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8390 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	27566 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8390 vs 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	27566 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

99809

70535

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25232

6316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

8390

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

27566

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

25232

6316

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

8390

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

27566

Name	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super	AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark	18253
PassMark - G2D Mark	886
Geekbench - OpenCL	99809	70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1438.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25232	6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25232	6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	27566
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super	AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 1.0
Code name	TU104	Pitcairn
Launch date	2 July 2019	13 March 2015
Launch price (MSRP)	$499
Place in performance rating	133	165
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	925 MHz
Core clock speed	1605 MHz	900 MHz
CUDA cores	2560
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	88 C
Pipelines	2560	1024
Render output units	64
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	215 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	13.6 B	2,800 million
Floating-point performance		1,894 gflops
Texture fill rate		59.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Port	1.4
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays	4
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	4.556” (115.7mm)
Length	10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)	650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	6 pin + 8 pin	1x 6-pin
Width	2-Slot
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	4800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready