NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1709 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 14345
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 14345
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 5 January 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1709 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 14345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 14345 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 215 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 14345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 14345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 5 January 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 133 | 72 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13.6 B | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 250 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
