NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1920
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18253 vs 14150
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 750
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99809 vs 70625
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 220.337
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3131.344
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 21.852
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 vs 135.923
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1141.283
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 20094
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 20094
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1920 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 vs 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 vs 70625 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 vs 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 20094 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 34% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3718
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3359
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3718
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3359
- 1069.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7489 vs 7
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 vs 7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 14150 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 750 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99809 | 70625 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 7489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 133 | 150 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1365 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1920 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |