NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 846 MHz
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 192
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
  • 5.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
  • 28.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18245 vs 641
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 441
  • 23.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 1087
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3071
  • 23.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 1087
  • Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2012
  • Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3071
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 July 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 846 MHz
Pipelines 2560 vs 192
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 18245 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 886 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25232 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25232 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3071

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

  • 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 215 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 215 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
18245
641
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
886
441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25232
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25232
1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3071
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark 18245 641
PassMark - G2D Mark 886 441
Geekbench - OpenCL 100123
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 293.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4045.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 29.145
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 158.103
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1438.826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25232 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25232 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3071
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Essentials

Architecture Turing Kepler 2.0
Code name TU104 GK208
Launch date 2 July 2019 23 July 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Place in performance rating 134 827
Type Desktop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 1605 MHz 846 MHz
CUDA cores 2560
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 88 C
Pipelines 2560 192
Render output units 64
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 215 Watt 30 Watt
Transistor count 13.6 B 1270 Million
Floating-point performance 324.9 gflops
Texture fill rate 13.54 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Port 1.4 1.2
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Multi monitor support
Number of simultaneous displays 4
Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 4.556” (115.7mm)
Length 10.5” (266.74mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 650 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 6 pin + 8 pin
Width 2-Slot
Interface MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 19.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 2400 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Ansel
HDMI 2.0b
SLI
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus