NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 846 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1 GB
- 5.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 28.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18245 vs 641
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 886 vs 441
- 23.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 1087
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3071
- 23.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 1087
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2012
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3071
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 846 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18245 vs 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 vs 441 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 215 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18245 | 641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 100123 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 1087 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 2012 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3071 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | GK208 |
Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 134 | 827 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 846 MHz |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 192 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 13.6 B | 1270 Million |
Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | 1.2 |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | |
Width | 2-Slot | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |