NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 885 vs 827
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 vs 827 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19986 vs 18251
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 99847
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 25232
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 25232
- 2166.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19986 vs 18251 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 99847 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 25232 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 25232 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18251 | 19986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 827 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | 138072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 15164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 2 July 2019 | 18 December 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $2,499 |
| Place in performance rating | 133 | 90 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 4608 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13.6 B | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Length | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6 pin + 8 pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
