NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD FirePro W7170M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and AMD FirePro W7170M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16169 vs 3162
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 418
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88130 vs 50809
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 6796
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 6796
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 17 October 2018 vs 2 October 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 723 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16169 vs 3162 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 vs 50809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 6796 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7170M
- Around 75% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 175 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3722 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3722 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7170M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD FirePro W7170M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16169 | 3162 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 | 418 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 | 50809 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 6796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3362 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD FirePro W7170M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU106 | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 17 October 2018 | 2 October 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Place in performance rating | 140 | 420 |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc Pro A60
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
