NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16177 vs 13932
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 825 vs 815
- Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88523 vs 69812
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.062 vs 171.616
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.133 vs 16.925
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1303.435 vs 1195.863
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 13044
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 October 2018 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16177 vs 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 825 vs 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88523 vs 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 vs 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 vs 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 vs 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3729.447
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 154.621
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3718
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3350
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3718
- 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3350
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 vs 3729.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 vs 154.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16177 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 825 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88523 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 17 October 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 140 | 118 |
Price now | $499.99 | $999 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | 13.37 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |