NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs AMD Radeon R7 M465X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and AMD Radeon R7 M465X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 4.5x more pipelines: 2304 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16176 vs 1624
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 825 vs 440
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 October 2018 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16176 vs 1624 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 825 vs 440 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M465X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon R7 M465X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16176 | 1624 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 825 | 440 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8882 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | AMD Radeon R7 M465X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Tropo |
Launch date | 17 October 2018 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Place in performance rating | 140 | 306 |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 512 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s |