NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21785 vs 16169
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 824
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 vs 88130
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 vs 252.062
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 vs 3729.447
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 vs 27.133
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 vs 154.621
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 vs 1303.435
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 22615
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 22615
- Around 65% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 vs 8875
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21785 vs 16169 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 824 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 vs 88130 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 vs 252.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 vs 3729.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 vs 27.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 vs 154.621 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 vs 1303.435 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 vs 8875 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16169 | 21785 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 | 14606 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU102 |
Launch date | 17 October 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $999 |
Place in performance rating | 140 | 83 |
Price now | $499.99 | $1,279.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | 17.22 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |