NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 175 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 791
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88130 vs 74179
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 154.621 vs 153.677
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 19571
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 19571

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1410 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1620 MHz
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 16169
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 vs 252.062
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 vs 3729.447
• Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 vs 27.133
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 vs 1303.435
• Around 57% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 8875

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	16169 18872
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	824 791
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	88130 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	252.062 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3729.447 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.133 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	154.621 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1303.435 1534.582
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22615 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	8875 13943

Compare specifications (specs)