NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1095 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 24x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 500 MHz
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13147 vs 8137
• Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 81953 vs 53806
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 141.474
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 vs 3621.344
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.75 vs 13.132
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 112.973
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1116.69 vs 799.933
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 10141
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3713
• Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 10141
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3713

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

• 2.8x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2944
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 745 vs 536
• 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 8060
• 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 8060

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13147 8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 745
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	81953 53806
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	297.996 141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3676.805 3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.75 13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.692 112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1116.69 799.933
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8060 38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8060 38251

Compare specifications (specs)