NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
• 6.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13147 vs 10972
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 170.923
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3676.805 vs 3178.443
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.75 vs 16.732
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 11029
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 7766
• Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 11029
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 7766

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG

• Around 96% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1095 MHz
• Around 39% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2944
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 588 vs 536
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 vs 162.692
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1231.051 vs 1116.69

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13147 10972
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	297.996 170.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3676.805 3178.443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.75 16.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.692 173.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1116.69 1231.051
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 7766
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 11029
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 7766

Compare specifications (specs)