NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
• 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 81953 vs 69812
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 171.616
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.75 vs 16.925
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 13044
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 7164
• Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 13044
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 7164

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1095 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 13147
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 536
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3676.805
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.788 vs 162.692
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1195.863 vs 1116.69
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 8060
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 8060

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13147 13932
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	536 815
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	81953 69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	297.996 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3676.805 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.75 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.692 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1116.69 1195.863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8060 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19139 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8905 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8060 30936

Compare specifications (specs)