NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1095 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2944 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 79991 vs 70535
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 6316
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 8390
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 6316
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 8390
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79991 vs 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 8390 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 8060
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 8060
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 8060 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 8060 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13154 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 538 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79991 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 27566 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU104B | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 143 | 163 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 1024 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s |