NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K510M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 15.3x more pipelines: 2944 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- 20.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13147 vs 641
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 536 vs 441
- 17.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 1087
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 2012
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3071
- 17.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 1087
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 2012
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3071
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 vs 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 vs 441 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3071 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 846 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Core clock speed | 846 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K510M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 | 641 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 | 441 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 2012 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3071 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7988 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K510M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104B | GK208 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 142 | 830 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 846 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 192 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 1270 Million |
| Floating-point performance | 324.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 13.54 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
