NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 81% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13147 vs 11869
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 80746 vs 39431
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 13107
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3354
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 13107
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3354
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 5 March 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 vs 11869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 80746 vs 39431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 988 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1114 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2944
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 695 vs 536
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 988 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2944 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 695 vs 536 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 | 11869 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 | 695 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 80746 | 39431 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 13107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7988 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104B | GM200 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 5 March 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 142 | 233 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 988 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 8,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 285.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 6612 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 317.4 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
