NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 24x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 812 vs 745
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 8137
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 10141
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 10141
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6319 vs 3713
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6319 vs 3713
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 vs 745 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 vs 8137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 2944
- 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 5714
- 6.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 5714
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 2944 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 5714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 5714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10098 | 0 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 745 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 | 8137 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 | 38251 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53806 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.132 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.973 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 799.933 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 106 | 188 |
Price now | $699.99 | $849 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | 17.05 |
Design | reference | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 2x 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 277 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 3x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |