NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 13932
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 13044
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1590 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 15107 vs 13932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 22622 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 22622 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 6319
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 6319
  • 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 5714
  • 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 5714
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 815 vs 812
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 6319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 6319
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 5714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 5714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
812
815
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15107
13932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22622
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22622
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6319
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6319
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5714
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5714
30936
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10104
PassMark - G2D Mark 812 815
PassMark - G3D Mark 15107 13932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 22622 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 22622 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6319 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6319 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 5714 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 5714 30936
Geekbench - OpenCL 69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 29 January 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 106 117
Price now $699.99 $999
Type Laptop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 37.18 13.37
Launch price (MSRP) $999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1590 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1380 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 2944
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 13,600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 2000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6