NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 230 Watt
- 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15107 vs 13932
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22622 vs 13044
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22622 vs 13044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 vs 13932 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 vs 13044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 6319
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 6319
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 5714
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 5714
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 815 vs 812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 6319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 5714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 5714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10104 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 812 | 815 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15107 | 13932 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22622 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22622 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6319 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6319 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5714 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5714 | 30936 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 69812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 171.616 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1195.863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 106 | 117 |
Price now | $699.99 | $999 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 37.18 | 13.37 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 12,500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |