NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD Radeon 625
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon 625 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 730 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- 12.2x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 24.58 GTexel/s
- 8x more pipelines: 3072 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 94% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
- 10x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 2032
- 10x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 2032
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 vs 2920
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 vs 2920
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 13 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 730 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 24.58 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 2032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 2032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 vs 2920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 vs 2920 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 625
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 55.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3215 vs 58
- 55.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3215 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3215 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3215 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 625
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon 625 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10786 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 2032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 2032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 2920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 2920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3215 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3215 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1085 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.876 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 322.556 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.478 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.423 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon 625 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Polaris 24 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 13 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 203 | 1134 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 730 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | 49.15 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | 786.4 GFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | 786.4 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 8.192 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 24.58 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 14.40 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |