NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 50% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 14115
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 14115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 21 Jan 2020 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 199.7 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 14115 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7991 vs 3652
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7991 vs 3652
- 340.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 19735 vs 58
- 340.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 19735 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7991 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7991 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 19735 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 19735 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 14115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 7991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 7991 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 19735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 19735 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 60737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 683 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11959 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 5600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Navi 10 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 21 Jan 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 203 | 125 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1130 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | 399.4 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.78 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | 6.390 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 199.7 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 10300 million |
| Compute units | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
