NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 99% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10795 vs 5414
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 14998
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 14998
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 14 March 2019 |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 vs 5414 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 14998 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3652
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 58
- 57.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 58
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 58 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 | 5414 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 14998 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 3359 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57151 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU116 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 14 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 203 | 240 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 8004 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |