NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10795 vs 7353
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20291 vs 20002
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20291 vs 20002
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 vs 7353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 vs 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 vs 20002 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 150 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3652
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3652
- 174.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 58
- 174.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 58
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 58 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 58 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10795 | 7353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20291 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20291 | 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 10384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 58 | 10130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 58 | 10130 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13930 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 632 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU104B |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 203 | 115 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1080 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 299.5 GFLOPS (1:32) | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (2:1) | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.585 TFLOPS | 5.530 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 172.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 80 W |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590 GME
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile vs
AppleA14 Bionic
